Skip to content

fix(miner): page contribution-profile label fetches past 100 (#8010)#8040

Merged
loopover-orb[bot] merged 1 commit into
JSONbored:mainfrom
andriypolanski:fix/8010-contribution-profile-label-pagination
Jul 22, 2026
Merged

fix(miner): page contribution-profile label fetches past 100 (#8010)#8040
loopover-orb[bot] merged 1 commit into
JSONbored:mainfrom
andriypolanski:fix/8010-contribution-profile-label-pagination

Conversation

@andriypolanski

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Summary

  • extractContributionProfile fetched /labels?per_page=100 once, so repos with >100 labels silently dropped eligibility/exclusion signals past page 1.
  • Label fetch now follows Link: rel="next" with the same page= loop shape as ci-poller.ts check-run pagination, fail-open on a later-page failure.

Closes #8010

Scope

  • The PR title follows type(scope): short summary Conventional Commit format, for example fix(api): restore profile access checks.
  • This PR is focused and does not mix unrelated backend, UI, MCP, docs, dependency, and deploy changes.
  • This follows CONTRIBUTING.md and does not reintroduce GitHub Pages, VitePress, site/, or CNAME.
  • I linked a currently open issue this PR resolves (e.g. Closes #123) — a linked open issue is required for every contributor PR.

Validation

  • git diff --check
  • npm run actionlint
  • npm run typecheck
  • Scoped coverage: npx vitest run --coverage test/unit/contribution-profile-extract.test.tscontribution-profile-extract.ts 100% lines/branches; 26 tests green (after npm run build:miner).
  • npm run test:workers
  • npm run build:mcp
  • npm run build:miner
  • npm run test:mcp-pack
  • npm run ui:openapi:check
  • npm run ui:lint
  • npm run ui:typecheck
  • npm run ui:build
  • npm audit --audit-level=moderate
  • New or changed behavior has unit/integration tests for new branches, fallback paths, and sanitizer boundaries

If any required check was skipped, explain why:

  • Miner lib change only. Ran build:miner + the contribution-profile-extract suite with coverage. Full test:ci not re-run here.

Safety

  • No secrets, wallet details, hotkeys, coldkeys, user PATs, private keys, raw trust scores, private rankings, or private maintainer evidence are exposed.
  • Public GitHub text stays sanitized, low-noise, and does not imply compensation guarantees or optimization tactics.
  • Auth, cookie, CORS, GitHub App, Cloudflare, or session changes include negative-path tests.
  • API/OpenAPI/MCP behavior is updated and tested where needed.
  • UI changes use live API data or real empty/error/loading states, not production mock/demo fallbacks.
  • Visible UI changes include a UI Evidence section below with JPG/JPEG or PNG screenshots arranged as organized, captioned, clickable thumbnails. SVG screenshots are not used as review evidence. Review-only screenshots or recordings are not committed to the repository.
  • Public docs/changelogs are updated where needed; changelogs are only edited for release-prep PRs.

UI Evidence

N/A — miner lib pagination; no UI.

Notes

  • Required pattern: ci-poller.ts hasNextLink + page= loop.
  • ≤100-label repos unchanged (no rel=next → single page).

…ed#8010)

Follow GitHub Link rel=next the same way ci-poller pages check-runs so
extractContributionProfile sees the full label set, not only page one.

Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
@superagent-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Superagent didn't find any vulnerabilities or security issues in this PR.

@loopover-orb loopover-orb Bot added the gittensor:bug Gittensor-scored bug fix — scores a 0.05x multiplier. label Jul 22, 2026
@loopover-orb

loopover-orb Bot commented Jul 22, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Tip

✅ LoopOver review result - approve/merge recommended

Review updated: 2026-07-22 14:54:08 UTC

2 files · 1 AI reviewer · no blockers · readiness 95/100 · CI green · clean

✅ Suggested Action - Approve/Merge

  • safe to merge

Review summary
This PR correctly fixes the label-fetch pagination bug: `fetchRepoLabels` now loops over `page=` parameters following the `Link: rel="next"` header, matching the existing `ci-poller.ts` pagination shape, and preserves the fail-open contract on a null/non-array/failed page. The bounded 50-page cap prevents runaway loops, and the empty-page guard prevents an infinite loop against a malformed API that keeps advertising `rel="next"` on an empty page. Test coverage is thorough, covering the happy path, fail-open on a later-page failure, empty-array termination, and non-array termination — all four new branches in `fetchRepoLabels` are exercised.

Nits — 5 non-blocking
  • `hasNextLink` in contribution-profile-extract.ts:127-131 assumes `response.headers.get` always exists, defended only by a `typeof` check — worth a one-line comment noting why the guard exists (a stub Response in some test path lacking `.get`) since it's not obvious from the surrounding code.
  • The compiled `.js` sibling file shown in context (`contribution-profile-extract.js`) has not been regenerated to match the new pagination logic — confirm the build step that produces it runs before this ships, since the checklist only ticks `build:miner` not a diff of the generated output.
  • `MAX_LABEL_PAGES = 50` (contribution-profile-extract.ts:139) is a reasonable but arbitrary cap; consider a one-line note on why 50×100=5000 was chosen over, e.g., matching whatever cap `opportunity-fanout.js` uses verbatim, for consistency.
  • Consider extracting the repeated `emptyHeaders` object literal across the many test cases in contribution-profile-extract.test.ts into a single shared test helper/constant to cut duplication.
  • The `getJsonResponse`/`getJson` split (contribution-profile-extract.ts:104-125) is clean; verify no other call site of the old `getJson` signature was relying on it returning the response object (looks confined to `fetchContributing`, which is fine).

Decision drivers

  • ✅ Code review — No blockers (1 reviewer)
  • ✅ Gate result — Passing (No configured blocker found.)
Context & advisory signals — never blocks the verdict
Signal Result Evidence
Linked issue ✅ Linked #8010
Related work ✅ No active overlap found No same-issue or scoped active PR overlap found.
Change scope ✅ 20/20 Low review scope from cached public metadata (1 linked issue).
Validation posture ✅ 25/25 PR body includes validation/test evidence.
Contributor workload ✅ 10/10 Author activity: 205 registered-repo PR(s), 128 merged, 22 issue(s).
Contributor context ✅ Confirmed Gittensor contributor andriypolanski; Gittensor profile; 205 PR(s), 22 issue(s).
Improvement ✅ Minor risk: clean · value: minor · LLM: moderate
Linked issue satisfaction

Addressed
The diff replaces the single-shot labels fetch with fetchRepoLabels, which loops with page= params and follows the Link rel="next" header (mirroring ci-poller's pagination convention) until exhausted, fail-open, or capped, directly fixing the >100-label truncation described in the issue.

Review context
  • Author: andriypolanski
  • Role context: outside_contributor
  • Public audience mode: oss maintainer
  • Lane context: Repository is configured for direct PR review.
  • Public profile languages: Python, TypeScript, JavaScript, Rust, Cuda, Kotlin, MDX, Scala
  • Official Gittensor activity: 205 PR(s), 22 issue(s).
  • PR-specific overlap: none found.
Contributor next steps
  • Start here: Triage stale or unlinked PRs.
Signal definitions
  • Related work = same linked issue, overlapping active PRs, or title/path similarity.
  • Change scope = cached public metadata such as size labels, draft state, and review-burden hints.
  • Validation posture = whether the PR provides enough public validation/test evidence for maintainer review.
  • Contributor workload = public contributor activity and cleanup pressure, not a repo-wide quality failure.
  • Contributor context = public GitHub/Gittensor identity context; non-Gittensor status is not a blocker.
🧪 Chat with LoopOver

Ask LoopOver a question about this PR directly in a comment — grounded only in the same cached, public-safe facts shown above, never a new claim.

  • @loopover ask &lt;question&gt; answers contribution-quality Q&A with source citations and freshness.
  • @loopover chat &lt;question&gt; answers in natural prose from cached decision-pack facts via local inference (maintainer/collaborator; read-only).
  • A plain-language @loopover mention with a real question is routed to the closest matching read-only command automatically — no exact syntax required.

Full command reference: https://loopover.ai/docs/loopover-commands

🧪 Experimental — new and may change.

🟩 Safe / merged · 🟦 Advisory · 🟨 Held for review · 🟥 Blocked / closed


💰 Earn for open-source contributions like this. Gittensor lets GitHub contributors earn for the work they already do — register to start earning →.

Checked by LoopOver, a quiet PR intelligence layer for OSS maintainers.

  • Re-run LoopOver review

@loopover-orb loopover-orb Bot left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LoopOver approves — the gate is satisfied and CI is green.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

gittensor:bug Gittensor-scored bug fix — scores a 0.05x multiplier.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

extractContributionProfile's label fetch never follows pagination past 100 labels

2 participants